Security





News
Intellian’s eagerly-awaited C700 Iridium Certus® maritime terminal has now been launched and is expected to quickly secure a reputation as the most powerful and technically advanced Iridium Certus® terminal on the market. With its best-in-class RF performance, the C700 can deliver out-of-the-box uplink speeds of 352kbps and downlink speeds of 704kbps by default, with equally impressive low-elevation-angle RF efficiency thanks to its unique 12-patch phased array antenna technology. It will support three high-quality, low-latency phone lines simultaneously, and as a solid-state antenna with no moving parts inside, the C700 is especially robust, requiring no scheduled maintenance over its lifetime. Advanced performance The Below Deck Unit (BDU) incorporates key features which make it ready to deploy without additional cost The advanced performance of the C700 provides customers across all markets with the flexibility to deploy it as the primary communication antenna or as a companion to a VSAT system for seamless redundancy. For primary communications, the Below Deck Unit (BDU) incorporates key features which make it ready to deploy without additional cost, including firewall, IP PBX, WAN port and built-in Wi-Fi. Hardware and software functions such as these, incorporated into the system, make the C700 the most powerful, feature-rich L-band solution on the market, delivering best in class performance and functionality. Rapid and low-cost installation The innate stability and reliable connectivity afforded by the C700 also make it an ideal platform for future safety services, including the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS). The C700 delivers installation efficiency both through the product design and the commissioning process. The BDU, weighing approximately 1.2kg, is available as a standalone bulkhead mount system or a 19” all-in-one rack-mount version. With its small, lightweight and space-saving form factor, the C700 can be carried on board by just one technician or crew member for rapid and low-cost installation. Once the C700 is installed, the built-in, user-friendly AptusLX software enhances the commissioning and setup experience of customers and partners. Iridium VP on the partnership Wouter Deknopper, Vice President and General Manager of Maritime, Iridium, observes: “Many vessel owners and operators may decide against VSAT for budgetary reasons, lack of deck space or the absence of adequate coverage on their voyage routes, so Iridium Certus is ideal as a primary means of communication, supported by the ease of upgrading to the C700 from an existing system.” “Iridium Certus also excels as a VSAT companion, combining the benefits of LEO with GEO, and L-band with Ku-band. VSAT can suffer from certain degradations and also isn’t global. That’s where you need a strong hybrid system, and Intellian, of course, is a highly respected manufacturer of maritime VSAT antennas and the new C700.” “So it is in a strong position to offer a very competitive turnkey hybrid package on the market. The flexibility of the airtime packages Iridium and our partners offer for Intellian customers is also an essential consideration in such uncertain times for the shipping industry and beyond.” Benefits of L-band L-band is particularly resistant to rain fade and other forms of atmospheric interference L-band is particularly resistant to rain fade and other forms of atmospheric interference, and the C700’s 12-element antenna arrangement is designed to supply rapid and efficient tracking performance, leading to optimal high-speed data and voice connections. Troels Christensen, Product Manager, EMEA, Intellian, explains: “The signal stability is exceptional even on fast boats or smaller vessels in rough seas, where you may experience heavy pitch and roll.” An attractive proposition for crew communications with its multiple high-quality voice lines, the C700 is also protected with Intellian’s international support and service network infrastructure, and comes with a three-year warranty for parts and labor. Time and cost efficient “The fact that it can be retrofitted by reusing a vessel’s old mast mount, cables, and power supply saves additional time and money,” adds Troels Christensen. “There’s no need for extra boxes, there are no hidden costs, and Iridium Certus provides truly global coverage, even at the poles, so the C700 is an L-band innovation that pays ample dividends not just for smaller vessels, but right across the board.” Words from Intellian CEO Eric Sung, CEO, Intellian Technologies, concludes: “We’re delighted to partner with Iridium and believe our C700 is a great addition to our innovative maritime product portfolio. “The new C700 antenna is a great choice for multiple customer segments, delivering an affordable solution which leads the market in speed and functionality.”
Anemoi Marine Technologies Ltd, an industry pioneer in wind-assisted propulsion systems, has announced that it is collaborating with Hafnia Limited, Guangzhou Shipyard International (GSI), and DNV to develop the integration design of Rotor Sails suitable for installation on 50,000 dwt Medium-Range (MR) tanker vessels. The companies signed a Joint Development Project (JDP) in April 2025 to develop a new generation of efficient and environmentally friendly Rotor Sail vessel designs to increase the efficiency of MR tankers within the wider global fleet. How Rotor Sails can improve Anemoi and Hafnia will undertake several engineering studies to establish specifications As part of the project, Anemoi and Hafnia will undertake several engineering studies to establish specifications related to how Rotor Sails can be safely and efficiently installed on the deck of MR tankers, alongside additional electrical and control system layouts for these vessels. In addition, the studies will include calculations to examine how Rotor Sails can improve the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) and Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) values of existing and future MR tankers. Rotor Sail’s design integration GSI will apply its naval architecture and marine engineering principles to develop essential technical documentation for the new Rotor Sail’s design integration, while DNV will undertake an Approval in Principle (AiP) assessment to ensure that the design is feasible and verifies that no significant obstacles exist to prevent the design from being realised based on current and foreseeable regulatory and class requirements. “Participating in this joint development project allows us to collaborate with industry partners to unlock the full potential of Rotor Sails on MR Tankers. It supports Hafnia’s decarbonisation strategy to assess and embrace the potential of innovative technologies to improve fuel efficiency and reduce vessel emissions,” shared Jesper Kristiansen, Hafnia’s General Manager Technical. Vessel energy efficiency DNV will undertake an Approval in Principle (AiP) assessment to ensure that the design is feasible “WAPS, like Rotor Sails, are spreading throughout the industry, enabled by new materials, data and software, and evolving rules and regulations. Across all segments, we still have room to improve vessel energy efficiency and WAPS have emerged as one of the most attractive tools for shipping to make immediate, impactful gains in this area." "DNV is very pleased to be part of this forward-looking group, and build on a cooperation with Anemoi, Hafnia and GSI that is driving shipping’s journey towards a more sustainable future,” said Mr Shao Guang Chi, Station Manager of Guangzhou Station at DNV Maritime. Integrating Rotor Sails into MR tankers “With new regulations driving the need for lower emissions, the time is right to adopt highly efficient ship designs." "Integrating Rotor Sails into MR tankers is a necessary step, and together with our partners, we’re committed to delivering vessels that meet both environmental and commercial demands,” said Deputy Chief Engineer, Huang Jun of Guangzhou Shipyard International (GSI). Tanker sector for novel technology Rotor Sails, also known as ‘Flettner Rotors’, are vertical cylinders that harness the renewable power “There is growing interest within the tanker sector for novel technology that can help reduce the carbon footprint of their vessels and increase their value, particularly as the MR tanker fleet is expected to grow in the coming years." "Our partnership with Hafnia, alongside GSI and DNV, will ensure a new generation of MR tankers that utilises Rotor Sails to improve their efficiency and sustainability credentials hits the water in the not-too-distant future,” said Nick Contopoulos, Chief Production and Partnerships Officer of Anemoi. Reduce the carbon emissions and fuel consumption Rotor Sails, also known as ‘Flettner Rotors’, are vertical cylinders that harness the renewable power of the wind to provide additional forward thrust and improve the energy efficiency of the vessel. This energy-saving technology is increasingly being sought after by ship owners and operators as a cost-effective and immediate solution to reduce the carbon emissions and fuel consumption of their vessels, as well as helping meet international emission reduction targets.
As the FuelEU Maritime regulation enters into force, the shipping industry may be looking at a surprising upside. Instead of acting solely as a cost driver, the regulation could create a net financial gain, potentially around €250 million, according to a recent analysis by maritime data and compliance firm OceanScore. “FuelEU isn’t just another penalty,” said Albrecht Grell, Managing Director at OceanScore. “It’s structured in a way that can push money back into parts of the industry — but only if you understand where and how that happens.” Understanding the compliance landscape OceanScore’s analysis focuses on the balance of GHG intensity compliance under FuelEU OceanScore’s analysis focuses on the balance of GHG intensity compliance under FuelEU. The initial compliance deficit across vessels exceeding the regulation’s threshold is estimated at around 2.1 million metric tons (MT) of CO₂e, while more efficient vessels — mainly LNG and LPG carriers — generate a surplus of about 1.3 million MT of CO₂e. That leaves a net compliance gap of roughly 0.8 million MT, which is likely to be closed using biofuels. These fuels, such as UCOME, have a lower calorific value and higher price point, but offer the advantage of emissions reduction credits and corresponding savings under the EU ETS. At the prices, factoring in the ETS phase-in rate of 70% and current exchange rates, covering this compliance gap via biofuels is expected to cost the industry around €200 million, or €230 per MT of CO₂e. While that’s not insignificant, it’s a relatively modest figure for an industry of this scale. What happens on the revenue side? The other half of the story is about how emissions-related costs are passed on, especially in container, ferry, and cruise segments, which together make up nearly 50% of total emissions. In many cases, emissions surcharges are now included in COAs, and some are linked to FuelEU’s penalty levels. “It’s not a universal practice, but we’ve seen a significant number of surcharges that shadow the penalty rates,” Grell said. “And when you run the numbers, even conservatively, the revenue side starts to look pretty interesting.” How sustainable that is remains uncertain OceanScore’s model assumes that just half of the operators apply surcharges at two-thirds OceanScore’s model assumes that just half of operators apply surcharges at two-thirds of the penalty rate, which equates to about €640 per MT of CO₂e. Under these conditions, total additional revenue could reach €450 million. Subtracting compliance costs leaves a potential net gain of €250 million — although how sustainable that is remains uncertain. “Windfalls like this don’t last forever,” said Grell. “But in the short term, there’s clearly value on the table. The trick is knowing how to capture it — and who actually does.” Who benefits — and why managers matter Who benefits from this value shift depends on where they sit in the value chain. Owners, charterers, and ship managers all have different exposure to compliance costs and different leverage in passing them along. Charterers may aim to pass on more cost than they reimburse, owners will negotiate how these costs are handled, and managers - especially third-party ones - often sit at the centre of compliance obligations. Responsibility for compliance FuelEU doesn’t just introduce a new rule, it’s setting the stage for a compliance credit market “Ship managers are in a uniquely exposed position,” says Grell. “They carry the responsibility for compliance but typically operate on tight margins. The additional cost, for tools, processes, and reporting systems could quickly reach €3,000–4,000 per vessel annually.” “Managers shouldn’t be shy about asking for their share of this upside,” Grell said. “They’re doing the heavy lifting, and it’s in everyone’s interest that they’re properly resourced to do it well.” Preparing for a new compliance market FuelEU doesn’t just introduce a new rule, it’s setting the stage for a compliance credit market. As operators buy and sell surpluses and deficits, pricing, liquidity, and strategy will become real levers for competitiveness. OceanScore is working with shipping companies to help them navigate this evolving space, offering data-driven compliance tools, emissions strategy support, and access to pooling mechanisms. “Whether you’re a charterer, an owner, or a manager, this is a moment to get ahead of the curve,” Grell said. “The costs are manageable, and the opportunity is real — but only if you’re prepared.”
How does ammonia behave when it leaks in an engine room? How does a cloud of escaped ammonia disperse during bunkering operations? These and many other critical safety questions that must be understood if ammonia is to become widely adopted as a marine fuel are addressed in the latest industry-leading ABS research. Risks associated with ammonia dispersion Safety Insights for Ammonia as a Marine Fuel brings together the findings of advanced ABS research into the performance of ammonia on board. Safety Insights for Ammonia as a Marine Fuel brings together the findings of advanced ABS research ABS performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using advanced tools to quantitatively assess the risks associated with ammonia dispersion in accidental leakage scenarios. ABS engineers examined realistic bunkering situations such as ship-to-ship, terminal-to-ship and truck-to-ship, as well as ammonia dispersion from the vessel due to a leakage incident in the engine room. Analysis of ammonia dispersion studies “This publication provides a comprehensive report of ABS’ efforts to address the challenges and opportunities presented by ammonia as a marine fuel." "Through detailed analysis of ammonia dispersion studies and emergency evacuation protocols, ABS is contributing to the discourse on safe and supportable maritime fuel alternatives, fostering a culture of preparedness and resilience,” said Vassilios Kroustallis, ABS Senior Vice President, Global Business Development. Advancements in software and hardware In addition to CFD simulation analysis, ABS leveraged the latest industry best practices and advancements in software and hardware – including acoustic cameras for detecting and visualising ammonia leakage – to provide a thorough, three-part framework for owners and operators evaluating ammonia as a cleaner fuel source: Proactive regulatory engagement and risk anticipation Development and implementation of a multifaceted safety framework, combining qualitative and quantitative risk assessments Real-time monitoring and optimised emergency response
Expert commentary
When the Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention came into force in 2004, it was in response to a crisis we couldn’t afford to ignore—one where invasive aquatic species, carried silently in ships’ ballast tanks, were devastating marine ecosystems. Now, two decades later, compliance with this environmental safeguard is no longer optional—and yet, as recent industry findings reveal, record-keeping failures account for 58% of compliance issues. That’s not a technology problem. That’s a documentation problem —one rooted deeply in data management practices and crew training, where small oversights lead to documentation issues, that may cascade into costly compliance failures. And that’s precisely where digital systems excel, guiding crews clearly to avoid mistakes in the first place. New ballast regulations At the IMO’s 82nd Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 82), new ballast water record-keeping regulations were approved, coming into effect from 1 February 2025. These updates mark a significant tightening of documentation standards—and they could catch unprepared shipowners off guard if not acted on promptly. Why ballast water record-keeping is back in the spotlight These new updates aim to change that—and they’re stricter, smarter, and more detailed than before While MEPC 82 made headlines for advancing decarbonisation policies and ECAs in the Arctic and Norwegian Sea, it also honed in on ballast water—a topic that has quietly regained importance. The committee approved critical updates to how ballast water operations and ballast water management system (BWMS) maintenance are recorded. The goal: Enhance transparency, reduce ambiguity, and reinforce environmental protection by making records more structured, traceable, and actionable. This renewed focus is both a warning and an opportunity. In recent years, too many Port State Control detentions and inspection delays have stemmed not from hardware failures, but from poorly maintained or unclear ballast water records. These new updates aim to change that—and they’re stricter, smarter, and more detailed than before. What’s changing: Bypass scenarios and maintenance logging The revised guidelines introduce two new scenarios for vessels dealing with challenging water quality (CWQ) in ports: Scenario 3: A reactive bypass of the BWMS due to unforeseen poor water quality. Scenario 4: A pre-emptive bypass based on anticipated CWQ conditions. These additions are essential for vessels operating globally, particularly those above 400GT. They ensure that alternative operations—like ballast water exchange plus treatment (BWE + BWT)—are clearly documented. Without accurate records, even legitimate actions can fall short of compliance. Ballast Water Management Plan and OEM manuals MEPC 82 also mandates that BWMS care procedures must now be recorded directly in BWRB MEPC 82 also mandates that BWMS maintenance procedures must now be recorded directly in the Ballast Water Record Book (BWRB), in line with the ship’s Ballast Water Management Plan and Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) manuals. Responsible crew members must sign off on these records, ensuring traceability and crew accountability. This step isn’t just regulatory housekeeping—it aligns ballast water maintenance with how other onboard systems are already tracked, from engines to emissions. It’s a logical, overdue move toward consistency across compliance. Paper or digital: The format dilemma While the BWRB can still be maintained on paper or electronically, the burden of new structured data fields and stricter reporting timelines will be felt most by those still tied to manual systems. Each additional layer of documentation increases the chance of human error—and with nearly 6 in 10 compliance failures already stemming from admin issues, that’s a risk many operators can’t afford. This is where digital solutions can offer real relief. At NAPA, we’ve already implemented the latest IMO guidelines into our electronic logbook, so crews can comply with MEPC.369(80) requirements out of the box. With ready-made entry templates and smart input validation, data entry is quick, accurate, and audit-ready. NAPA implemented the latest IMO guidelines into an electronic logbook. Better still, once updated, operators can apply for the BWM Convention Electronic Record Book Declaration from their flag—ensuring that compliance is recognised internationally under MEPC.372(80). Less admin, more assurance Electronic logbooks don’t just streamline compliance—they enable better decision-making. When connected to onboard systems, they automatically pull operational data into the BWRB, reducing manual work and error margins. This frees up the crew to focus on operations and safety, rather than paperwork. From a management perspective, real-time visibility into ballast operations and maintenance records helps shore teams stay ahead of inspections and identify potential compliance gaps early. One logbook, many regulations While ballast water is the focus today, it’s not the only regulation demanding attention While ballast water is the focus today, it’s not the only regulation demanding attention. At NAPA, we’ve designed our logbook to support a wide range of evolving compliance frameworks—including MARPOL, EU-ETS, EU-MRV, CII, and the Garbage Record Book. This unified approach removes silos, reduces duplicated effort, and gives operators a more holistic view of vessel performance and compliance. A smarter way forward With decarbonisation and environmental regulations shifting at breakneck pace, even the most experienced crews and fleet managers can struggle to stay up to date. That’s where technology has a crucial role to play—not to replace expertise, but to support it. At NAPA, we work closely with shipowners and operators to configure regulatory record book templates according to their fleet workflows and each vessel’s specific operational profile. This ensures accuracy, ease of use, and most importantly, continuous compliance—even as the rules keep changing. Because in today’s compliance landscape, staying ahead isn’t just about meeting the minimum. It’s about building systems that help you adapt, respond, and thrive. And that starts with getting the record-keeping and data management right.
Maritime communications came a long way before they could deliver the first Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS). Still, it is fair to say that their forward march has only accelerated in the two-and-a-half decades since. Today, shipping companies rely on satellite connectivity to protect their vessels and people and enable the digitalisation, decarbonisation, and crew-welfare initiatives on which its successes rely. Low-Earth orbit (LEO) networks Against this background, the new generation of low-Earth orbit (LEO) networks has entered the maritime market to great fanfare and expectation from ship owners, and their excitement is justified: LEO satellite coverage has the potential to span the globe, providing exceptional reliability and speed even during long voyages in the most remote locations. This facilitates real-time communication and efficient coordination between vessels and onshore personnel, ultimately supporting more profitable and sustainable fleet operations. Level of connectivity Moral obligations and regulatory requirements aside, providing high-quality crew internet LEO’s introduction into the maritime sphere has been equally well received by seafarers, who stand to benefit from a level of connectivity that keeps them better connected to family and friends than ever before, and to richer entertainment options at sea. Moral obligations and regulatory requirements aside, providing high-quality crew internet represents a wise investment from a competitive standpoint, enhancing as it does an organisation’s ability to attract and retain the brightest talent. Another advantage to seafarers and their employers, LEO connectivity offers stable onboard access to non-leisure services including mental-health support, telemedicine, and online learning resources, helping to keep a crew happy, healthy, and up to speed with the evolving requirements of their job. Limitations For all the benefits of LEO networks, it is important to acknowledge their limitations. For instance, LEO’s promise of delivering worldwide coverage remains to be realised, with certain countries yet to authorise its use in their territorial waters. This means that, depending on the trading route, a ship may encounter multiple LEO-coverage blackspots during its voyage. Susceptible to interference Regardless of the network type being used, vessels still need to compress and throttle data Like many satellite technologies, LEO networks are also susceptible to interference from atmospheric conditions that can disrupt communications, while network congestion at hotspots and drop-out at satellite handover may present additional connectivity challenges. Regardless of the network type being used, vessels still need to compress and throttle data on certain occasions, such as while in port, but LEO networks currently cap utilisation and therefore limit connectivity and availability further. Crew and commercial use In addition, maritime organisations should consider whether their LEO system is for both crew and commercial use. For a vessel deploying LEO connectivity to cover crew and business communications simultaneously, even a terabyte of data is unlikely to go far. Divided among a crew of 25, it equates to 40 gigabytes per person, enough for 13 hours of HD streaming with nothing remaining for commercial requirements. The solution Maritime software including critical communications-based services will need to be compatible with LEO To ensure reliable and consistent connectivity, support enhanced GMDSS communications, and meet the bandwidth needs of all stakeholders, a vessel will require multiple satellite provisions. This means that maritime software including critical communications-based services will need to be compatible with both LEO and more traditional, low-bandwidth networks and be able to switch between connections automatically to ensure uninterrupted service. GTMailPlus GTMaritime’s GTMailPlus, for example, is compatible with all major network types, regardless of bandwidth. Developed with optimisation in the maritime environment in mind, it provides secure and efficient data transfers irrespective of the service or combination of services a shipowner or manager uses. If disruptions do occur, GTMailPlus resumes data transmission from the point of interruption. Risk of a cybersecurity breach There have already been several reported cases of ship owners falling victim to significant cyber incidents As crew freedoms on the Internet increase and more onboard devices are connected to the network, the risk of breaches to cybersecurity is also rising dramatically: effectively, the vessel becomes a larger attack surface. There have already been several reported cases of ship owners falling victim to significant cyber incidents having adopted LEO systems without taking the necessary security precautions. Robust, intelligent, and scalable network Given that ships transfer diverse types of data that often involve critical and sensitive information, the consequences of any breach of vessel operations, safety, and privacy can be severe. Here too, the GTMaritime portfolio is continuously evolving to ensure robust, intelligent, and scalable network protection for owners. AI-based next-gen anti-virus technology In addition to the enhanced security features included in all GTMaritime solutions, enables a holistic approach In the latest partnership with CrowdStrike, GTMaritime’s cyber-security offering combines AI-based next-generation anti-virus technology with end-point detection and response capabilities. This, in addition to the enhanced security features included in all GTMaritime solutions, enables a holistic approach to vessel security. Conclusion LEO networks undoubtedly present a considerable opportunity for the maritime industry and have the power to transform connectivity at sea. However, there are several factors to consider before adopting an LEO system and regardless of advances in technology, optimised solutions for critical communications, security, and data transfer remain essential.
Aiming to establish minimum requirements for the cyber-resilience of newbuild vessels and their connected systems, IACS unified requirements (URs) E26 and E27 provide a new benchmark for shipping’s response to its growing exposure to cyber-attacks. Officially in force from 1 July 2024 and broadly welcomed by industry, the new URs represent another step forward in strengthening Maritime's resilience to the evolving cyber threat. However, according to a thought-provoking discussion recently hosted by Edwin Lampert, Executive Editor of Riviera in partnership with Inmarsat Maritime (a Viasat company), shipping companies must still conduct comprehensive risk assessments and implement appropriate mitigation measures. Vessel’s cyber security They ensure all stakeholders are responsible for the vessel’s cyber security Kostas Grivas, Information Security Officer, Angelicoussis Group told the ‘IACS URs E26 & E27: Bridging the gap between regulation and implementation’ session that the URs bring “obvious benefits” such as eliminating “scattered requirements”. They provide “common and crystal-clear ground for auditing and control purposes”, and establish “a solid description of the minimum technical, procedural, and other criteria that govern a vessel’s cyber resilience,” he said. Finally, they ensure “all stakeholders are responsible for the vessel’s cyber security”. Makiko Tani, Deputy Manager, Cyber Security at classification society ClassNK, also acknowledged that the new requirements will “contribute to the visibility of ever-digitalising shipboard networks and their assets”, however, as there is no one-size-fits all cybersecurity solution to all, she continued, “additional controls beyond those specified in the requirements may be necessary, depending on the vessel’s connectivity”. Digital transformation strategy To properly address the cyber risks that a specific vessel is exposed to, she said, “shipowners must conduct a thorough cyber-risk assessment. This relies on a ‘C-level commitment’ to establishing a cyber-security programme that facilitates compliance with URs E26 and E27 and any other future industry requirements while supporting the organisation’s digital transformation strategy”. The importance of looking beyond the IACS URs was also emphasised by Laurie Eve, Chief of Staff, Inmarsat Maritime, who proposed three key areas where companies should “focus and invest not only to meet new requirements but also to go beyond compliance and build good cyber resilience”. Quality management system and standards The firm should focus on training and grasping, managing user rights, investing in a regime system “The first key area, ‘people and culture’, addresses the notion that people are the weakest link in cyber security. According to a 2023 report from the United States Coast Guard as well as findings from Inmarsat’s security operations centres, phishing is the most common initial access vector in cyber-attacks. Investing in people, therefore, should be an absolute no brainer”, commented Eve. Specifically, he continued, a company should focus on training and awareness, managing user privileges, investing in a quality management system and standards such as ISO 27001, assessing suppliers’ risk-management practices, and embedding cyber-security in the organisation’s continuous improvement culture. Risk-management approach The third and final key area according to Eve is an ‘incident response plan’ (IRP). The second key area is ‘network-connected systems and services’. Given the number of attack surfaces on board a vessel and the ever-growing volumes of data moving between systems, many companies lack the time and resources to address all possible weaknesses. The solution, Eve said, is a risk-management approach in which the organisation assesses the risks, sets its risk appetite, and implements security measures according to the costs it is willing and able to bear. The third and final key area according to Eve is an ‘incident response plan’ (IRP). It’s prudent to assume that at some point there will be failures and a breach, an IRP comprises a robust set of contingencies to keep the cost of business disruption to a minimum. It requires investment in backup and data systems as well as regular staff training. “Having a plan is good; training, rehearsing, and improving the plan is better,” explained Eve. Cyber-security requirements While these recommendations apply to all ship owners, Eve acknowledged that there are differences from small to large operators in terms of the budget and internal capability invested in cyber resilience. “Inmarsat’s Fleet Secure offers a ‘one-stop shop’ for cyber-security requirements which makes it a particularly good fit for “smaller operators without the in-house capability to put together their own solutions”, he said. Inmarsat’s Fleet Secure offers a ‘one-stop shop’ for cyber-security requirements Combining three powerful components – Fleet Secure Endpoint, Fleet Secure Unified Threat Management, and Fleet Secure Cyber Awareness Training – the Fleet Secure portfolio provides the tools and facilitates a risk-management approach, supporting “compliance with the new requirements” and, more broadly, “increasing cyber resilience”, Eve added.
Harbour insights
Traditionally, bulk cargo unloading has faced challenges around operational efficiency, safety risks, environmental impacts, and high operational costs. Rough discharges, equipment wear, vibration damage, and limited weather operating windows have all constrained vessel utilisation and performance. Moreover, older unloading systems are energy-intensive and labour-dependent, increasing both costs and environmental footprint. Cargo unloading systems Many bulk cargo unloading systems depend on steep slope angles, which limit the types of materials that can be carried efficiently. MacGregor’s GravityVibe directly addresses this factor by allowing efficient discharge with significantly lower slope angles, thus broadening the range of cargo that can be handled. Many bulk cargo unloading systems depend on steep slope angles. Ship structures and unloading equipment “GravityVibe reduces reliance on gravity alone by augmenting the flow with controlled vibration,” says Mikael Hägglund, Senior Manager, Cranes at MacGregor. “This approach improves operational efficiency, enhances safety through more predictable material flow, and reduces wear on ship structures and unloading equipment.” Challenges of space utilisation and cargo versatility MacGregor is a provider of cargo and load handling solutions to maximise efficiency Additionally, the GravityVibe system will, in most cases, require only one hold conveyor and no cross conveyor in the hold, making the operations both cost-effective and sustainable, says Hägglund. MacGregor, based in Helsinki, Finland, is a provider of cargo and load handling solutions to maximise efficiency of maritime operations. As an augmented gravity self-unloading system, GravityVibe enhances cargo flow using vibration, enabling bulk materials to be discharged efficiently at lower slope angles (15–20 degrees). It reduces material blockages and optimises discharge without requiring steep holds, addressing the challenges of space utilisation and cargo versatility. Mechanical strain on vessel structures The system lessens mechanical strain on vessel structures, and supports safer, smoother, and more efficient operations across different cargo types. “Using lower slope angles allows ships to maximise cargo hold volume and transport a wider variety of bulk materials, including those that would not flow well with conventional systems,” says Hägglund. “It improves operational flexibility.” Integrity of the vessel Vessels benefit from a more compact and efficient hold design, optimising stability and construction Structurally, vessels benefit from a more compact and efficient hold design, optimising stability and potentially lowering construction and maintenance costs, adds Hägglund. “Managing vibration and sound levels is critical for maintaining the structural integrity of the vessel and ensuring crew safety and comfort,” he says. “Excessive vibration can lead to accelerated wear on ship components and fatigue damage over time.” GravityVibe’s design GravityVibe’s design ensures that both vibration and sound levels stay well below class-defined thresholds, preserving vessel longevity and reducing long-term maintenance and repair costs. Bulk cargoes have widely varying properties such as particle size, cohesiveness, moisture content, and chemical reactivity, all of which impact flow behaviour. Sticky, wet, or coarse materials require different unloading strategies to avoid blockages, segregation, or structural strain. Bulk cargoes have widely varying properties like particle size and cohesiveness. Broader spectrum of cargo types Key elements to achieve automation include fine-tuning self-optimisation algorithms GravityVibe’s vibration-driven approach adapts to these material differences, maintaining consistent discharge rates and ensuring operational reliability across a broader spectrum of cargo types without manual intervention or excessive mechanical modification, says Hägglund. More automated systems are on the horizon. Fully automated discharge is rapidly approaching reality, thanks to intelligent unloading systems like GravityVibe. Key remaining elements to achieve automation include fine-tuning self-optimisation algorithms, integrating predictive maintenance solutions, and standardising automation interfaces between vessels and ports. GravityVibe features MacGregor is actively working to refine onboard software, improve material recognition capabilities, and enhance real-time adjustment features. Wider industry adoption and regulatory frameworks are also crucial for achieving fully autonomous and seamless bulk unloading. GravityVibe features a built-in self-optimisation system that uses sensors to monitor material flow characteristics during discharge. Based on live data, it automatically adjusts vibration frequency and intensity to match the properties of each specific cargo, ensuring optimal unloading performance without manual recalibration. MacGregor is working to refine onboard software and improve material recognition. GravityVibe’s performance GravityVibe’s performance has been verified through a combination of laboratory studies MacGregor is fine-tuning this system by gathering real-world data from full-scale test rigs, analysing operational performance across various cargo types, and incorporating feedback loops to continually improve discharge efficiency and system responsiveness. Real-world validation is essential to prove that unloading systems perform reliably under operational conditions. GravityVibe’s performance has been verified through a combination of laboratory studies and full-scale rig testing. In-house tests and studies For example, validation by bulk solids researcher TUNRA showed efficient unloading across diverse materials such as wood chips, manufacturing sand, and gravel. In-house tests and studies with external specialists like KTH have confirmed low vibration levels, consistent discharge flow, and high operational reliability, providing strong evidence for commercial deployment. TUNRA showed efficient unloading across diverse materials such as sand. GravityVibe’s system design GravityVibe’s system design is based on long-lasting parts and improved cargo flow High maintenance requirements traditionally have led to significant downtime and increased operational costs. GravityVibe’s system design is based on long-lasting components and improved cargo flow that reduce risks for failures and needed service, thereby lowering maintenance costs/needs. “With real-time monitoring and smart diagnostics, potential issues can be detected and addressed before they escalate, minimising service interruptions,” says Hägglund. “This proactive approach enhances equipment availability and ensures better operational continuity for vessel operators.” MacGregor GravityVibe system When unloading standard bulk carriers, there is a need to clean the holds with manpower and external machines as the port cranes or the vessel cranes will not be able to empty the holds. The weather could also be a factor for delay in cases where the cargo is sensitive to water. For the MacGregor GravityVibe system, all material will be removed from the hold without any extra efforts. GravityVibe demonstrates that with intelligent use of vibration and lower slope angles can achieve the same — or even better — results. This approach not only enables broader cargo flexibility but also reduces structural stress, energy consumption, and environmental footprint.
Ammonia is gaining traction as a future fuel in the maritime industry, primarily due to its potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A key driver for ammonia's interest is that it can be carbon-free when combusted, which aligns with the maritime industry's increasing pressure to meet emissions regulations. However, most ammonia production currently relies on fossil fuels. Transitioning to "green ammonia" production is crucial for sustainability. If "green ammonia" is produced using renewable energy sources, it offers a pathway to near-zero emissions shipping. Safety measures and regulations Ammonia’s volumetric energy density – higher than hydrogen – makes it more practical for onboard storage. However, ammonia is toxic, which requires stringent safety measures and regulations for handling and storage. The combustion of ammonia can produce nitrous oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas. Therefore, mitigation technologies are needed. Building the necessary infrastructure for ammonia bunkering and supply will be a significant undertaking. Developing guidelines for safe use Ammonia is poised to play a significant role in the maritime industry's transition to a future The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is developing guidelines for the safe use of ammonia as a marine fuel. Increasing numbers of companies are investing in the development of ammonia-fueled vessels and technologies. European Union (EU) legislation, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the FuelEU initiative to support decarbonisation, are pushing the maritime industry towards the use of alternative fuels, which is increasing the potential of ammonia. While challenges remain, ammonia is poised to play a significant role in the maritime industry's transition to a more sustainable future. Ongoing research and development Ongoing research and development are focused on improving safety, reducing emissions, and scaling up production. In essence, ammonia offers a promising pathway for the maritime industry to reduce its carbon footprint, but its widespread adoption depends on overcoming technical and logistical challenges. Working toward the future of ammonia Progress is already happening as the maritime industry works toward a future that includes the use of ammonia as a fuel. For example, one project underway aims to be a pioneer in establishing a comprehensive and competitive supply chain to provide clean ammonia ship-to-ship bunkering in the U.S. West Coast. Progress is already occurring as the maritime industry works toward a future A feasibility study is being conducted at the Port of Oakland, Benicia, and nearby major ports on the U.S. West Coast. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between American Bureau of Shipping, CALAMCO, Fleet Management Limited, Sumitomo Corp. and TOTE Services LLC is jointly conducting the feasibility study. "We are proud to share our industry-pioneering expertise in ammonia as a marine fuel to support this study on the U.S. West Coast,” said Panos Koutsourakis, Vice President of Global Sustainability at the American Bureau of Shipping. “Our expertise in developing safety guidelines will support the consortium to address the ammonia-specific set of safety and technology challenges.” More global ammonia developments In another development, three LPG/ammonia carrier ships have been ordered at the South Korean shipyard HD Hyundai Heavy Industries (HD HHI). Danish investment fund European Maritime Finance (EMF) and international shipping company Atlas Maritime have confirmed the order. HD HHI’s parent company, HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering (HD KSOE), revealed the order for $372 million in March 2024. The three 88,000 cubic-metre LPG dual-fuel carriers, capable of carrying and running on ammonia, are scheduled for delivery in December 2027. The vessels will be named EMF Viking I, II, and III. Also, Lloyd’s Register (LR) and Guangzhou Shipyard International have signed a joint development project to design the world’s largest very large ammonia carrier (VLAC). The design of the 100,000-cubic-metre vessel has been assessed in line with LR’s Structural Design Assessment and prescriptive analysis. The gas carrier will have an independent IMO Type B tank for safe carriage of the chemical. Zero-emissions operations The cargo ship, which will be 7,800 dwt, is designed to transport timber from Norway to Europe “As major economies look to co-fire ammonia in their coal power stations to reduce the CO2 footprint of their national energy mix, shipping will play a key role in distributing clean hydrogen-based commodities such as ammonia, thereby supporting nations to meet their Paris Agreement commitments," says LR's Chief Executive Nick Brown. Furthermore, a partnership of companies from Norway has ordered a pioneering short-sea cargo ship that will advance the industry’s ability to provide zero-emissions operations. The cargo ship, which will be 7,800 dwt, is designed to transport timber from Norway to Europe and will be the first to operate on ammonia and electricity. Amogy’s ammonia-to-electrical power system A start-up company focusing on ammonia-to-power technology, Amogy, demonstrated the first tugboat powered by its cracking technology just short of the fourth anniversary of the company’s launch. The trip of a 67-year-old tug along a tributary of New York State’s Hudson River is part of the company’s works to develop and commercialise its technology to decarbonise the most difficult industries. Amogy’s ammonia-to-electrical power system splits, or “cracks,” liquid ammonia into its base elements of hydrogen and nitrogen. The hydrogen is then funnelled into a fuel cell, generating the power for the vessel. Research points to the risks of ammonia The chemical, made of hydrogen and nitrogen, can also be burned as a zero-carbon fuel Today and in the future, ammonia, a main component of many fertilisers, can play a key role in a carbon-free fuel system as a convenient way to transport and store clean hydrogen. The chemical, made of hydrogen and nitrogen, can also be burned as a zero-carbon fuel. However, new research led by Princeton University scientists illustrates that even though it may not be a source of carbon pollution, ammonia's widespread use in the energy sector could pose a grave risk to the nitrogen cycle and climate without proper engineering precautions. Use of ammonia U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)-supported research found that a mismanaged ammonia economy could ramp up emissions of nitrous oxide, a long-lived greenhouse gas around 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide and a major contributor to the thinning of the stratospheric ozone layer. The use of ammonia could lead to substantial emissions of nitrogen oxides, a class of pollutants that contribute to the formation of smog and acid rain. And it could directly leak fugitive ammonia emissions into the environment, forming air pollutants, impacting water quality and stressing ecosystems by disturbing the global nitrogen cycle. Negative impacts of an ammonia economy The researchers found that the potential negative impacts of an ammonia economy "We have great hope that ingenuity and engineering can help reduce our use of carbon-based energy sources," said Richard Yuretich, a program director in NSF's Division of Earth Sciences. "But caution is advised because of unintended environmental spillover effects that may result from new technology." The researchers found that the potential negative impacts of an ammonia economy may be minimised with proactive engineering practices, but the possibility of risks should not be taken lightly. Addressing an inconvenient reality As interest in hydrogen as a zero-carbon fuel has grown, so too has an inconvenient reality: It is notoriously difficult to store and transport over long distances, requiring storage at either temperatures below -253 degrees Celsius or at pressures as high as 700 times atmospheric pressure. Ammonia, on the other hand, is much easier to liquify, transport and store, and capable of being moved around similarly to tanks of propane. Nonetheless, the cycle of nitrogen is delicately balanced in Earth's critical zone, and extensive research must be undertaken to investigate the repercussions of ammonia combustion and to develop new methods to minimise the risks. Challenges of ammonia as a maritime fuel Here's a breakdown of the key challenges of using ammonia for maritime fuel: Toxicity and Safety: For human health, ammonia is highly toxic, posing a serious risk to human health through inhalation or skin contact. This necessitates stringent safety protocols, advanced leak detection systems, and thorough crew training. Relating to the environment, leaks can also harm aquatic ecosystems, requiring robust containment and mitigation measures. Combustion Challenges: Ammonia's combustion characteristics are less favourable than traditional fuels, requiring modifications to engine design and potentially the use of pilot fuels. Emissions: Combustion can produce nitrogen oxides (NOx) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which are harmful pollutants. Mitigating these emissions is crucial. "Ammonia slip" is also a concern, in which unburnt ammonia is released. Infrastructure and Supply Chain: Establishing a global network of ammonia bunkering infrastructure is a massive undertaking, requiring significant investment and coordination. Scaling up "green ammonia" production, using renewable energy, is essential for its sustainability. This requires a robust and reliable supply chain. Storage: Ammonia has specific storage requirements, and onboard storage systems must be designed for safety and efficiency. International Standards Needed: Consistent and comprehensive international regulations and standards are needed for the safe handling, transportation, and use of ammonia as a marine fuel. While the IMO is developing Guidelines, complete and ratified rules are still needed. Economic challenges: "Green ammonia" is currently more expensive than traditional fuels, although costs are expected to decrease as production scales up. Significant investments are needed in research, development, and infrastructure to make ammonia a viable maritime fuel. Also, dedicated ammonia-fueled engines are still under heavy development, and do not have widespread availability. The path to commercialisation Overcoming the variety of technical and other obstacles will require collaboration among governments, industry stakeholders, and research institutions. The timeline for ammonia deployment in maritime applications is actively unfolding, with key milestones happening now and soon. 2025 marks the first trials of two-stroke, ammonia dual-fuel engines on oceangoing ships. Engine manufacturers like MAN Energy Solutions and WinGD are progressing with their engine development, with initial deliveries soon. These pilot projects are crucial for gathering real-world data and building confidence in ammonia as a marine fuel. Development of comprehensive regulations As the maritime industry faces, ammonia is hoped to play a growing role in the fuel mix Gradual commercialisation will follow in the late-2020s as the technology matures and the infrastructure develops. The focus will be on refining engine technology, improving safety protocols, and establishing bunkering facilities in key ports. Wider adoption will likely follow in the 2030s, depending on factors such as the cost of green ammonia, the development of comprehensive regulations, and the expansion of the global supply chain. As the maritime industry faces increasing pressure to decarbonise, ammonia is expected to play a growing role in the fuel mix. Future of maritime It's likely that a combination of ammonia and other alternative fuels and technologies will be used in the future of maritime. Alternatives include methanol, liquid natural gas (LNG), hydrogen, biofuels, electric propulsion, and even nuclear power. Ammonia is a strong contender, bit it faces stiff competition from other promising technologies. The maritime industry's transition to a sustainable future will likely involve a diverse mix of fuel solutions.
The Dark Fleet refers to a network of vessels that operate outside of standard maritime regulations, often used to transport sanctioned goods such as oil. These shadowy vessels are also referred to by terms such as Parallel Fleet and/or Shadow, Gray or Ghost fleet. The terms are all manifestations of the same thing – ships that are owned, structured, and operated to avoid exposure to sanctions. Fleet of ships “In fact I would prefer that we use the term Parallel Fleet because it more accurately describes what it is,” says Mike Salthouse, Head of External Affairs, of NorthStandard, a Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurer. “Specifically, it is a fleet of ships operating in parallel to mainstream shipping while avoiding use of service providers that are subject to sanctions legislation.” Modern shipping sanctions Sanctions were to be enforced not just against the sanctions-breaking vessel but also the services Modern shipping sanctions can be traced back to the introduction of the U.S. Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act 2010 or “CISADA”. Under CISADA for the first time, sanctions were to be enforced not just against the sanctions-breaking vessel but also the services (for example insurance, class, flag, banks) that the vessel used. EU/G7 Coalition adopting sanctions As a result, all maritime service providers sought to distance themselves and introduce contractual termination clauses in their service contracts forcing such vessels to either trade without such services or to access them from non-sanctioning jurisdictions. This led immediately to the creation of mainly Iranian ships that could continue to carry cargoes subject to western economic sanctions – such as Iranian oil. However, the fleet has grown exponentially following the EU/G7 Coalition adopting sanctions targeting Russian shipping. Today the majority (but not all) of the Dark Fleet is engaged carrying Russian cargoes – but other trades include Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela. Protection of the marine environment Dark Fleet undermines transparent governance policies that ensure the welfare and safety “It might be that a removal of Russian sanctions would remove the need for such a fleet,” adds Salthouse. “But for so long as nations use maritime sanctions as a foreign policy tool, my own view is that the Dark Fleet phenomenon will continue to facilitate sanctioned trades.” The Dark Fleet undermines transparent governance policies that ensure the welfare and safety of those on board and the protection of the marine environment. In recent years, the safety of tankers has improved significantly. These improvements have been driven by factors such as greater operational oversight from the oil majors, younger double hull vessels, greater operational scrutiny, and more rigorous legislation. Safety has been prioritised over all else. Transport oil using ships and services “The commercial dynamics that apply to the Dark Fleet are very different,” says Salthouse. “The overwhelming commercial imperative is not safety but to transport oil using ships and services to which sanctions legislation does not apply. As such, the customer and regulatory oversight is much reduced.” The vessels used by the Dark Fleet also tend to be older. Even if it were possible to find shipyards that were prepared to build for use carrying sanctioned cargoes (and so risk secondary sanctions depriving them of access to western financial markets and insurers), the long build times mean that such ships would not become available for several years. As such, the vessels that comprise the Dark Fleet tend to be end-of-life and aged 15 years or older. Commercial reinsurance markets The insurers of the ship will likely have been unable to access commercial reinsurance markets used If and when an accident happens, the ability of the insurer to respond by using commercial salvors and pollution responders will be curtailed by sanctions legislation, and the insurers of the ship will likely have been unable to access commercial reinsurance markets commonly used to access the high levels of cover required to fully compensate victims. Sanctioning individual ships is an effective way of addressing the Dark Fleet because shipping that trades internationally invariably needs access to western financial and service markets, which a designation deprives them of. Collaboration with mainstream shipping EU/G7 Coalition States to date have designated over 100 vessels, but in practical terms, the Dark Fleet is much larger than this – somewhere in the region 600 to 1000 vessels – so more needs to be done, says Salthouse. Thought also needs to be given as to how to dispose of old designated tonnage (as designation will prevent scrapping) whilst at the same time addressing the supply side so that designated ships cannot simply be replaced. “That can only be achieved in collaboration with mainstream shipping which should be consulted and partner with governments to achieve their aim,” says Salthouse. Majority of shipowners and service Dark Fleet will thrive for so long as maritime sanctions are deployed by states as a means of foreign policy goals Without concerted state action delving with the existing fleet and its access to new ships, the Dark Fleet will thrive for so long as maritime sanctions are deployed by states as a means of achieving their foreign policy goals. The cost of compliance to mainstream shipping is huge. The vast majority of shipowners and service providers deploy significant resources to avoid inadvertently contravening applicable sanctions. EU/G7 Coalition partners should recognise that and work with the shipping industry to marginalise the commercial space served by the Parallel/Dark Fleet rather than simply imposing ever greater and more complex compliance requirements, comments Salthouse. Use of EU/G7 Coalition service In a majority of cases, the Parallel Fleet is not breaking any laws. With the exception of the UN sanctions programme directed at North Korea, the Parallel/Dark Fleet can trade perfectly lawfully. For example, it is not illegal for a Russian flagged ship, insured in Russia, classed in Russia and trading with non-EU/G7 Coalition partners to transport Russian oil sold above the price cap through international waters to non-EU/G7 Coalition states provided the trade does not make use of EU/G7 Coalition service providers. Use of established service providers The Parallel/Dark Fleet is bad for shipping and undermines EU/G7, and on occasions, UN sanctions programmes, says Salthouse. States cannot control a trade when the ships carrying the cargoes and the service providers involved are not subject to the jurisdiction of that State. Similarly, when ships sink and cause pollution, the whole shipping industry suffers by association, and the additional complexities involved in responding to a casualty that cannot make use of established service providers could make a bad situation much worse.
Case studies
San Francisco-based maritime technology company - Sofar Ocean announces a partnership with the U.S. Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command’s (CNMOC) Fleet Weather centres in Norfolk (FWC-N) and San Diego (FWC-SD). Wayfinder platform FWC-N and FWC-SD, the Navy’s two primary weather forecasting centres, are piloting Sofar’s Wayfinder platform to support the routing of naval vessels at sea. The FWCs are utilising Wayfinder to identify safe and efficient route options powered by real-time ocean weather data for Military Sealift Command (MSC) ships. Situational awareness Tim Janssen, Co-Dounder and CEO of Sofar, said, "Wayfinder will empower the Navy to enhance situational awareness at sea and leverage data-driven optimisation to continuously identify safe and efficient routing strategies." He adds, "Powered by our real-time ocean weather sensor network, Wayfinder will help the Navy scale its routing operations to support a heterogeneous fleet operating in conditions made more extreme by the effects of climate change." CRADA The platform displays real-time observational data from Sofar’s global network of Spotter buoys The Navy is evaluating Wayfinder under CNMOC and Sofar’s five-year Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) signed in July 2023. Wayfinder reduces manual tasks for forecasters and routers by automatically generating a forecast along a vessel’s route. The platform displays real-time observational data from Sofar’s global network of Spotter buoys to reduce weather uncertainty for route optimisation, and predict unwanted vessel motions during a voyage. Real-time wave and weather observations The availability of accurate real-time wave and weather observations helps Captains and shoreside personnel validate forecast models and examine multiple route options more efficiently, streamlining a historically complex and arduous process. Lea Locke-Wynn, Undersea Warfare Technical Lead for CNMOC’s Future Capabilities Department, said, "A key focus area for the Naval Oceanography enterprise is fostering a culture of innovation through collaboration with our commercial partners." Vessel-specific guidance Lea Locke-Wynn adds, "Our ongoing CRADA with Sofar Ocean is a perfect example of how our partnerships can leverage the leading edge in industry to further Department of Defence operations." As the number of naval vessels at sea, including experimental and autonomous ships, continues to increase, forecasters and routers will have less time to spend manually producing vessel-specific guidance. Automated forecast-on-route guidance More efficient routing empowers FWC personnel to focus on challenging, mission-critical tasks Wayfinder helps fill this operational gap, enabling FWC-N and FWC-SD to more efficiently support a large fleet in real-time with automated forecast-on-route guidance. More efficient routing empowers FWC personnel to focus on challenging, mission-critical tasks that require their unique expertise. Streamlined decisions Captain Erin Ceschini, Commanding Officer, FWC-SD, stated, "By using Wayfinder, we’re able to better visualise our ships’ routes, and make safer and more streamlined decisions on route, speed, and heading." Captain Erin Ceschini adds, "Wayfinder has the potential to be a critical component of our day-to-day operations and a key driver of safe routing as we contend with an increasingly unpredictable weather landscape."
Strengthening trade relations and promoting collaboration between Valenciaport and China. This is the objective with which the Port Authority of València has traveled to China to participate in the 8th edition of the Maritime Silk Road Port International Cooperation Forum 2024, held from June 26 to 28, 2024 in Ningbo (China). The value proposition of the Valencian enclosure as a green, intelligent and innovative HUB of the Mediterranean has been the common thread of the presentation of the PAV in this forum. Advantages of Valenciaport as a strategic port Mar Chao has also described the strategic importance of Valenciaport for the Chinese market During the event, Mar Chao, President of the PAV, had the opportunity to present the competitive advantages of Valenciaport as a strategic port in the center of the Mediterranean (through which 40% of Spanish import/export is channeled) at the service of the business fabric of its area of influence and a link in the logistics chain. Mar Chao has also described the strategic importance of Valenciaport for the Chinese market as a key point of direct connection with Europe that promotes a green growth, market-oriented, with maximum efficiency in services and a complete logistic and multimodal integration. Commercial capacity of Valenciaport During her conference, the President also highlighted the commercial capacity of Valenciaport, with an area of influence of more than 2,000 kilometres that maintains a direct relationship with the main international ports. Cristina Rodríguez, Head of Containers of Valenciaport, accompanies Chao in the forum. Both have held business meetings with Asian companies and institutions, including the new president of the Port of Ningbo, Tao Chengbo. In the framework of this meeting, the representatives of Valenciaport and the Port of Ningbo have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the aim of strengthening their commercial collaboration. Silk Road Port and Maritime Cooperation Forum The Silk Road Port and Maritime Cooperation Forum of Ningbo (China) in which Valenciaport participates is a platform for open exchange and mutual learning in port development and maritime transport, within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative. From a respect for the uniqueness of each participating port, the Forum is seen as a tool to foster collaboration in various fields to build bridges between supply and demand in business, investment, technology, talent, information, ports and cultural exchange.
GEM elettronica is proud to announce the conclusion of a strategic project to strengthen Lithuania’s defense capabilities, during which cutting-edge surveillance radars with airspace monitoring function were installed on four patrol ships of the Lithuanian Navy. The contract was executed successfully and within the agreed-upon timelines, thanks to the collaboration between the Italian defence companies Leonardo and GEM elettronica. Advanced radar system The heart of the system is the Columbus MK2 3D multi-mission radar developed and produced in house by GEM Elettronica, specially designed for coastal surveillance and naval applications, made with the latest technologies, which guarantee high detection performances for search and tracking of small and fast targets at both air and sea surface space, high reliability and availability with low maintenance and life cycle costs. It is a compact and lightweight advanced radar system for short- and medium-range detection performing all the functions of surveillance, self-defence, IFF capabilities and weapon designation. The new radar systems were installed on the Lithuanian Flyvefisken (Standard Flex 300) class offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) Žemaitis (P11), Dzūkas (P12), Aukštaitis (P14) and Sėlis (P15). Working effectively together The main role of the new equipment is to ensure the safety of ships when navigating in narrow passages The main role of the new equipment is to ensure the safety of ships when navigating in narrow passages (e.g., straits, port channels) and in the open sea, as well as in search and rescue missions. The systems will allow objects to be detected up to 100 kilometers away. The Commander of the Lithuanian Naval Forces Sea, Captain Giedrius Premeneckas underlined: “The successful implementation of this project represents a significant step in strengthening the capabilities of the Navy’s patrol vessels and significantly increasing our ability to carry out assigned tasks and work effectively together with NATO allies.” The President of GEM elettronica Ing. Antonio Bontempi answered “We are delighted to have successfully contributed to the realization of this strategic project. We are also proud of what achieved by our R&D and Production teams who worked together with passion and tenacity to ensure the project was achieved within the expected timescales.”
Bennett Marine, a Division of Yamaha Marine Systems Company, needed a solution that integrated solar energy generation and mechanical upgrades to optimise both sustainability and working environment outcomes. However, adding the cooling capacity needed by a large warehouse, and the employees working there, during the long Floridian summers could significantly increase the utility load on the building. Solution Bennett Marine’s management approached its outsourced service provider, ABM. Having successfully completed two lighting upgrades on site, and acting as the current janitorial service provider, ABM took Bennet Marine’s request to its Infrastructure Solutions team. ABM’s Infrastructure Solutions designed an energy-efficient HVAC system supported by a rooftop solar PV array that offset utility costs with renewable energy, leading to a net 58% reduction in total utility usage for the building. ABM also assisted in securing tax credits and energy incentives for the project, as well as a new roof for the facility with additional building envelope improvements. Finding a better solution for the client ABM provides a consultative approach to help clients achieve sustainability goals, enable capital improvements" “Service experts across our company worked together to solve a need and deliver the sustainability solution Bennett Marine needed,” said Mark Hawkinson, President of ABM Technical Solutions. He adds, “ABM provides a consultative approach to help clients achieve sustainability goals, enable capital improvements, improve indoor air quality, address waste and inefficiency, and create a positive impact for communities.” In addition to the new roof, net energy offset, and improved cooling, ABM was able to assist the project in receiving an estimated $226,000 in tax credits and $224,000 in Energy Incentives through the Federal MACRS (Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System). Benefits ABM’s Infrastructure Solutions enable businesses to invest in critical infrastructure needs and achieve sustainability, security, and resilience goals. A custom energy program drives costs out of operating budgets and redirects savings to critical needs, helping fund improvements. Highlights of the project for the Deerfield, Florida, warehouse include: Projected energy cost savings in the first year of $12,701 Replacement of ageing roof and speed roll doors to reduce energy loss Solar panel installation is capable of offsetting 66% of the building’s utility use